Judicial Independence and Democracy: Concerns and Expectations from India's Supreme Court
As advocates of democracy and the
rule of law, it is disheartening to observe the troubling trends in judicial
proceedings that seem to favor the encroachments of a dominant executive over
the democratic ethos of India. The Supreme Court of India, endowed with
significant judicial powers, faces a critical test in upholding justice and
curbing any dictatorial tendencies within the government.
Recent cases involving key
opposition figures, such as Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, have raised
alarm. The extended delays in their bail hearings, coupled with the stringent
provisions of the amended Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), reflect a
judicial approach that appears to shift the burden of proof onto the accused.
Such measures challenge the foundational legal principle that one is innocent
until proven guilty and hint at a judiciary that might be failing to exercise
its powers to protect democratic freedoms.
As Non-Resident Indians (NRIs),
we maintain a vested interest in the governance of India. Our historical
contributions to India’s independence and our ongoing involvement in sectors
like IT and telecommunications reflect our deep connections to the nation. We
see parallels between the current political maneuvers in India and those that
have led other nations toward religious and political extremism. We must voice
our concerns, advocating for a judicial system that serves all citizens
equitably and guards against the concentration of power.
The Supreme Court’s reluctance to
decisively act against unconstitutional legislative changes is concerning. The
Court must reassess its stance on such matters, ensuring that its judgments
reflect a commitment to the Constitution rather than transient political
interests. Our democratic institutions must not only operate independently but
must also be perceived as such, to maintain public confidence in their
impartiality and integrity.
In conclusion, the role of the
Supreme Court in safeguarding democracy cannot be overstated. The Court must
rigorously exercise its judicial review to prevent any drift towards
authoritarianism and ensure that the systems of checks and balances function as
intended. As members of the global Indian diaspora, it is our responsibility to
remain engaged and to advocate for a robust, transparent, and fair judiciary
that upholds the rule of law, ensuring that India continues to thrive as a
vibrant democracy.
So true, but then who will bell the cat!
ReplyDeleteSorry for this delayed response. If everyone decides that they won't stay quiet when injustice is happening in front of their eyes and start to speak up, then they will bell the cat (your reference for the change).
Delete