Nation Builders Vs Nation Sellers

 

Before 1947, the geographical area known as India was not a unified nation but rather a patchwork of princely states under British dominion. This landscape, collectively referred to by the British as "India," comprised various territories with their distinct governance structures, stitched together by colonial interests rather than intrinsic national unity.

The transformation into a sovereign nation began with the departure of the British, spearheaded by visionary leaders like Nehru, Patel, and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. They embarked on a complex mission to weave these disparate princely states into the fabric of a democratic India. The culmination of this mission was the framing and adoption of the Constitution of India on January 26, 1950, which established a central framework for governance and unified the diverse regions into a single republic.

This era of foundational growth contrasts sharply with the narrative propagated by the current BJP-led government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Since taking office in 2014, there has been a noticeable shift towards rewriting historical narratives and promoting a version of history that serves the political interests of the BJP and its ideological cohorts. This revisionism often glorifies certain aspects of India's past while downplaying or misrepresenting the complex realities of its diverse heritage.

Under Modi's leadership, significant state-run enterprises have been privatized, favoring large corporations owned by close allies like Adani and Ambani which has sparked widespread criticism and raised concerns about the concentration of wealth and power. Furthermore, Modi's government has been accused of borrowing extensively under the guise of progress, with funds purportedly aimed at infrastructure development being used to waive loans for wealthy corporations, thus transferring the financial burden to the general populace.

These economic strategies are often shielded by a barrage of nationalistic rhetoric which distracts from the substantive issues of governance and economic equity. The BJP's narrative, heavily circulated through platforms like WhatsApp and supported by followers of the controversial figure Godse—who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi—paints a picture of history and policy that many critics argue distorts the truth and misleads the public.

This rewriting of history and reshaping of public perception is a critical issue as it not only distorts the past but shapes India's future policy directions. The stark difference between the governance models of India's early leaders and the current regime highlights a shift from inclusive policies aimed at national development to strategies that prioritize privatization and benefit a select few.

The democratic ethos that once defined India's legislative and social framework is often overshadowed by these contemporary narratives. An anecdote from Nehru's time poignantly illustrates the democratic spirit intended by India's founding fathers. When confronted by an old woman about her gains from independence, Nehru's reply that she had "gained the authority to hold him accountable" underscores the essence of the democracy that is now under threat by current political narratives.

As India stands at a crossroads, the call for a return to principles that prioritize public welfare and transparent governance grows louder. It is crucial for the electorate and civil society to critically evaluate these revised narratives and push for policies that align with the democratic and egalitarian ideals that were foundational to India's independence and early years as a republic.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How We Turned an Abstract God into Concrete Hate

Image
  How We Turned an Abstract God into Concrete Hate Hindi Version: https://rakeshinsightfulgaze.blogspot.com/2025/12/blog-post_12.html God was never meant to be owned. In its earliest human understanding, God was abstract, unknowable, and undefined. People did not claim certainty over it. They sensed it in nature, in conscience, in fear, wonder, and humility. Worship had no walls. It happened under open skies, near rivers, in forests, and in silence. Spirituality was personal, inward, and restrained by doubt. Everything broke the moment humans tried to contain the abstract. The moment God was locked inside stone, gold, and spectacle, spirituality was replaced by religion. And once religion took physical form, it demanded control. Someone had to manage God. Interpret God. Defend God. Faith stopped being a personal search and became a collective identity. Identity demanded loyalty. Loyalty demanded enemies. This is where belief became power. At some point, humanity reached an abs...
Read more

Distraction as Governance: How a Scripted National Song Debate Shielded the SIR Controversy

Image
  Distraction as Governance: How a Scripted National Song Debate Shielded the SIR Controversy Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5jj6tmNYs20 Hindi Version: https://rakeshinsightfulgaze.blogspot.com/2025/12/sir_11.html Two days ago, India witnessed a moment that will not be remembered for what Parliament accomplished, but for how deliberately it avoided its responsibilities. Ten hours were spent debating Vande Mataram and reminiscing about 150 old songs, not because Parliament had run out of issues, but because the ruling party needed a distraction. Crucially, this spectacle unfolded just before the scheduled national debate on the Special Summary Revision, a process already mired in allegations of mass voter deletions and electoral manipulation. Seen in context, the timing was not random. It was strategic. It was engineered. The BJP leadership understood that the SIR debate could expose disturbing patterns: unexplained deletions, duplicate voter entries, unexplai...
Read more

Superstitions: Where Do They Come From, and Why Do People Believe in Them?

Image
  Superstitions: Where Do They Come From, and Why Do People Believe in Them? Hindi Version: https://rakeshinsightfulgaze.blogspot.com/2025/12/blog-post_14.html When undesirable events occur in our lives, our natural response is to look for reasons. We try to identify causes so we can avoid repeating the same outcomes. Often, this process is logical and helpful. We learn, adapt, and move forward. But this search for meaning does not always lead us to accurate conclusions. Sometimes, instead of identifying real causes, we attach significance to unrelated details. A coincidence becomes an explanation. A single occurrence becomes a pattern. When this happens, superstition begins to take shape. One of the most striking aspects of superstition is how little evidence it requires. A single event is often enough. If something good happens while a certain object is present, or something bad follows a particular action, the mind quickly connects the two. No repeated testing is needed...
Read more