Shameful Vacuum of Courage Wrapped in Supreme Court Robes
Jailed Supreme Court of India
Today, as I awaited the Supreme Court's decision on Arvind Kejriwal's situation, my disappointment mounted. The court's indecision was palpable, a stark display of a lack of courage, especially since the Enforcement Directorate (ED) failed to provide substantial proof to justify the arrest of Delhi's elected Chief Minister.
During the proceedings, when the ED attempted to link a profit of ₹1,100 crore from a governmental policy to a supposed scam, it seemed more an act of desperation than of justice. This profit, derived from a policy involving the alcohol business—a sector often villainized despite its economic contributions—should have been hailed as a fiscal success. Instead, it was twisted into an accusation. If there were any misappropriations, the funds would logically appear in private accounts, which they haven’t.
The Supreme Court's hesitance to make a decisive ruling reflects a broader issue of the judiciary seemingly bending under political pressures, particularly from the BJP. It’s a discouraging sign when the judicial system, expected to act as the pillar of impartiality and justice, shows signs of vulnerability to political influence.
This scenario unfolds amid a backdrop where the alcohol industry, despite being a substantial revenue generator, is continually stigmatized. Those who publicly decry it often benefit under the table, perpetuating a cycle of hypocrisy that robs the public of potential benefits like improved healthcare, infrastructure, and other public services.
The implications of today’s non-decision are profound, not just for Kejriwal but for the state of democracy in India. If the judiciary cannot stand up to political machinations, what hope remains for justice? This event may well be a bellwether, signaling that even the Supreme Court can falter under pressure, a somber realization for those who hold the law in high regard. As the elections continue, this development will undoubtedly resonate, shaping public perception and potentially influencing the electoral outcomes.
Comments
Post a Comment