Breaking News: Modi and Shah are Caught Red-Handed Committing Crime on Live TV

 

Breaking News: Modi and Shah are Caught Red-Handed Committing Crime on Live TV



After watching on TV how Modi and Shah encouraged the public to invest in the stock market, I decided to do some research to see if this kind of act by the Prime Minister and Home Minister violated any laws. Guess what? Here is the answer I found:

Yes, it is illegal for the Prime Minister of India, the Home Minister of India, or any government officials, to inflate stocks and make public statements to manipulate the stock market. This behavior is considered market manipulation and is strictly prohibited under Indian law. Such actions can mislead investors, distort market prices, and undermine the integrity of the financial markets.

Key Legal Aspects that Make Such Actions Illegal

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Regulations

1. Insider Trading: According to the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, trading based on material, non-public information is illegal. If the Prime Minister or Home Minister uses privileged information to influence stock prices, it falls under insider trading.

2. Market Manipulation: The SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003, specifically prohibit market manipulation. This includes spreading false or misleading information that affects the price of securities. If government officials make statements intending to inflate stock prices, they are engaging in market manipulation.

 Legal Consequences

1. Criminal Penalties: Engaging in market manipulation or insider trading can result in severe criminal penalties, including imprisonment. Under the SEBI Act, individuals found guilty of these offenses can face significant jail time.

2. Civil Penalties: SEBI can impose hefty fines and order disgorgement of any ill-gotten gains. The penalties are designed to deter such activities and maintain market integrity.

3. Administrative Actions: SEBI can also take administrative actions, such as banning individuals from trading in the securities market or holding directorial positions in listed companies.

 Public Trust and Ethical Considerations

1. Breach of Public Trust: The Prime Minister and Home Minister hold positions of significant public trust. Using their positions to manipulate stock prices would constitute a severe breach of this trust and could lead to a loss of confidence in the government.

2. Ethical Standards: High ethical standards are expected from public officials. Engaging in activities that distort the market undermines these standards and can have long-term negative impacts on the economy and the country's governance.

International Comparison

In many countries, including the United States, similar actions would also be illegal. For instance, in the U.S., the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforces laws against insider trading and market manipulation. Public officials found guilty of such activities face similar consequences, including imprisonment and fines.

Summary

It is illegal for the Prime Minister, the Home Minister, or any government official in India to inflate stocks and make public statements to manipulate the stock market. Such actions are considered market manipulation and insider trading, both of which are prohibited by SEBI regulations and can result in severe legal consequences.

People in India cannot afford to have criminals running their country, and therefore they must seek justice in courts, even if they have to go as high as the Supreme Court of India. I understand that SEBI officials may be scared to act against these individuals, knowing how they have in the past used government departments against the opposition, media, and anyone who has spoken against them. However, this crime is too obvious. You must work with opposition leaders who seem to be courageous, and your support will strengthen their efforts in this matter. There is no time to waste.

The integrity of India's democracy and financial markets is at stake. The actions of Modi and Shah represent a blatant abuse of power that must be addressed to uphold the rule of law and protect the interests of all Indian citizens.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How We Turned an Abstract God into Concrete Hate

Image
  How We Turned an Abstract God into Concrete Hate Hindi Version: https://rakeshinsightfulgaze.blogspot.com/2025/12/blog-post_12.html God was never meant to be owned. In its earliest human understanding, God was abstract, unknowable, and undefined. People did not claim certainty over it. They sensed it in nature, in conscience, in fear, wonder, and humility. Worship had no walls. It happened under open skies, near rivers, in forests, and in silence. Spirituality was personal, inward, and restrained by doubt. Everything broke the moment humans tried to contain the abstract. The moment God was locked inside stone, gold, and spectacle, spirituality was replaced by religion. And once religion took physical form, it demanded control. Someone had to manage God. Interpret God. Defend God. Faith stopped being a personal search and became a collective identity. Identity demanded loyalty. Loyalty demanded enemies. This is where belief became power. At some point, humanity reached an abs...
Read more

Distraction as Governance: How a Scripted National Song Debate Shielded the SIR Controversy

Image
  Distraction as Governance: How a Scripted National Song Debate Shielded the SIR Controversy Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5jj6tmNYs20 Hindi Version: https://rakeshinsightfulgaze.blogspot.com/2025/12/sir_11.html Two days ago, India witnessed a moment that will not be remembered for what Parliament accomplished, but for how deliberately it avoided its responsibilities. Ten hours were spent debating Vande Mataram and reminiscing about 150 old songs, not because Parliament had run out of issues, but because the ruling party needed a distraction. Crucially, this spectacle unfolded just before the scheduled national debate on the Special Summary Revision, a process already mired in allegations of mass voter deletions and electoral manipulation. Seen in context, the timing was not random. It was strategic. It was engineered. The BJP leadership understood that the SIR debate could expose disturbing patterns: unexplained deletions, duplicate voter entries, unexplai...
Read more

Superstitions: Where Do They Come From, and Why Do People Believe in Them?

Image
  Superstitions: Where Do They Come From, and Why Do People Believe in Them? Hindi Version: https://rakeshinsightfulgaze.blogspot.com/2025/12/blog-post_14.html When undesirable events occur in our lives, our natural response is to look for reasons. We try to identify causes so we can avoid repeating the same outcomes. Often, this process is logical and helpful. We learn, adapt, and move forward. But this search for meaning does not always lead us to accurate conclusions. Sometimes, instead of identifying real causes, we attach significance to unrelated details. A coincidence becomes an explanation. A single occurrence becomes a pattern. When this happens, superstition begins to take shape. One of the most striking aspects of superstition is how little evidence it requires. A single event is often enough. If something good happens while a certain object is present, or something bad follows a particular action, the mind quickly connects the two. No repeated testing is needed...
Read more