लापता चौकीदार Watchman Missing

 

लापता चौकीदार

Watchman Missing

Look at the Empty Chair (लापता चौकीदार)

 

In 2014, Narendra Modi presented himself as the vigilant watchman of the nation, promising to work tirelessly—up to 18 hours a day—to propel India to the forefront of global power. This image resonated with millions of Indians, who saw in him a leader capable of transforming the nation. However, as the years have passed, a more complex narrative has emerged, one that raises questions about the true beneficiaries of Modi's labor and the implications for India’s democracy.

The powerful elites in India, who played a significant role in Modi’s ascent to power, have arguably reaped the most rewards from his tenure. These influential entities, some argue, supported Modi not just for his work ethic but for his willingness to ensure that dissent was minimized as he facilitated the sale of valuable national assets to them. In return, the media—largely controlled by these same corporations—crafted and sustained the image of Modi as an unparalleled leader, solidifying his brand as the most powerful man in India, if not the world.

Yet, behind this carefully constructed persona, only Modi may have truly understood the extent to which his actions were dictated by these corporate interests. For a decade, with a weakened opposition and a public that largely accepted his narrative, Modi governed with an iron grip, enacting policies and making decisions that aligned closely with the interests of the powerful few.

The political landscape of 2024, however, marks a significant shift. Despite allegations of electoral malfeasance, Modi has found himself short of the absolute majority he previously enjoyed. Moreover, he is now facing a rejuvenated and determined opposition. This shift has led to noticeable changes in Modi’s behavior, particularly within the parliamentary sessions. His conspicuous absence from key debates, especially those where Rahul Gandhi is present, has fueled speculation about his confidence. Some observers suggest that Modi’s avoidance of Gandhi is driven by a deep-seated fear, a sentiment even Gandhi has alluded to in his speeches.

The stakes for Modi are undeniably high. Unlike previous political leaders who might simply retire after losing power, Modi’s past actions have created a precarious future for him. There are allegations and fears that his "karmas" may catch up with him, potentially leading to legal consequences and imprisonment, especially given his administration’s history of incarcerating opposition leaders on questionable grounds. While some corrupt politicians defected to Modi’s camp, those who remained uncompromised continued to face persecution.

The recent bail granted to Aam Aadmi Party leader Manish Sisodia by the Supreme Court in cases brought by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has further highlighted the challenges facing Modi’s government. After 17 months in prison without conclusive evidence, the release of Sisodia underscores the systemic issues within these agencies. In a different legal system, such as that of the United States, Sisodia might have been able to counter-sue the government for damages, raising questions about the misuse of power under Modi’s regime.

For Modi, the implications are clear. If he loses power, the same systems he once wielded against his opponents could be used against him. Unlike others, the evidence against him may already be substantial, increasing the likelihood of conviction and a lengthy prison sentence. His visible discomfort in Parliament may be a reflection of these looming threats.

In contrast, figures like Rajnath Singh, who have been sidelined in key decision-making processes by Modi and Amit Shah, appear more at ease, perhaps because they bear less responsibility for controversial actions. Meanwhile, business magnates like Ambani and Adani are reportedly recalibrating their strategies, anticipating a future where Modi is no longer in power. Ambani’s recent overture towards the Gandhi family, which was rebuffed, is indicative of this shifting dynamic, suggesting that the corporate alliances of the past decade may be restructured in the face of a changing political environment.

Even within the government, internal discord is becoming apparent. Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s recent controversial remarks to Jaya Bachchan have sparked discussions about his potential removal from office—a move that could signal broader instability within the ruling coalition.

As India approaches a critical juncture in its political history, the once unassailable image of Modi is beginning to show cracks. The future of the nation’s leadership hangs in the balance, and with it, the direction in which India will move. Will the opposition seize this moment to redefine the political landscape, or will Modi find a way to reclaim his dominance? The answers to these questions will shape the future of India for years to come.