The Commercialization of Idol Worship: A Reflection on Sanatan Dharma
The Commercialization of Idol
Worship: A Reflection on Sanatan Dharma
Connecting with Lord Shiva
In recent discussions, some have
raised concerns about my stance on idol worship, assuming that I am opposed to
Sanatan Dharma. I want to set the record straight: I am not against idol
worship, nor do I oppose the essence of Sanatan Dharma as I have understood it
throughout my life. The principles of dharma that I was raised with have shaped
a deep and meaningful perspective—one rooted in truth, justice, and the
well-being of all.
As a child, I may not have been
attentive to every ritual during prayer. However, I always made sure to be
present for the concluding portion, where the core message was emphasized:
uphold dharma, eradicate adharma, care for all beings, and work toward peace on
this planet. This is the Sanatan Dharma I grew up with, a tradition that
prioritizes moral integrity, universal compassion, and the fight against
injustice.
Adharma, as I learned, manifests
when people use God’s name to harm others, when judges manipulate the law to
punish the innocent, or when rulers deceive the public. A leader who lies to
their people embodies adharma. The greatest service we can offer is to stand up
against those who perpetuate such deceit and wrongdoing.
This is the Sanatan Dharma I
embrace. If your understanding aligns with these values, then you would
recognize that my stance is not against Sanatan Dharma.
Idol Worship: A Sacred Path,
Not a Commercial Enterprise
Idol worship, in my view, is one
of the most profound spiritual practices humanity has discovered. It offers
solace and mental relief from the hardships that life inevitably brings,
regardless of one’s power or position. However, while our ancestors may have
recognized the importance of idol worship, they might not have foreseen its
commercialization. What was once a sacred act has, in many cases, turned into a
business—a transformation where spiritual connection is often replaced by
personal gain.
To clarify, I am not opposed to
idol worship itself. My opposition lies in the commercialization of idol
worship, where faith becomes a profitable enterprise. If we look at ancient
examples, such as Lord Ram praying to Lord Shiva before building the bridge to
Lanka, there was no grand temple or lavish setting. It was simply an idol
placed near the ocean, and through this humble act of worship, Lord Ram sought
guidance. The focus here is clear—worship is about connecting with divine
forces, free from distractions.
This is where modern-day temples,
no matter how beautiful, sometimes miss the mark. Instead of fostering peace
and connection, the grandeur and opulence of these places can become
distractions, preventing true meditation and communion with the divine.
Consider the temples in Himachal
Pradesh, where only a few devotees visit. Despite the absence of crowds, these
places offer serenity and a deep sense of connection with the universe. This is
the true purpose of idol worship—peace, introspection, and spiritual
connection.
However, when public figures like
businessmen, celebrities, and politicians make a spectacle of their temple
visits, complete with grand donations and media attention, they are not
practicing genuine faith. Instead, they are commodifying it, using religion as
a platform for self-promotion. A striking example of this is when Prime
Minister Modi participated in the Ram Temple inauguration. His presence was not
about humble worship but about political opportunism. With 50 cameras
broadcasting his meditative pose, it was a carefully orchestrated spectacle
designed to manipulate public opinion and influence votes.
Unfortunately, this tactic
worked, and the public was deceived. Modi’s actions during the event violated
election rules, especially since votes were still being counted. The Election
Commission of India (ECI) should have intervened, holding him accountable for
using religious sentiment to secure political advantage. Instead, India was
left to contend with the consequences of such manipulation.
Reclaiming Idol Worship for
Genuine Spirituality
When idol worship is reduced to a
tool for political gain and commercial exploitation, I cannot support it. I do
not visit temples where the focus has shifted from spiritual connection to
public spectacle. Genuine worship requires peace, solitude, and the quiet
necessary to connect with a higher power.
For those who seek true spiritual
connection, I recommend a more personal approach. Choose an idol that speaks to
you, study its significance, and create your own rituals in the comfort and
tranquility of your home. Free from external distractions and public displays,
you will find it easier to connect with the divine. The power you seek is
already within you, and as you nurture this connection, it will bring positive
changes to your life.
Idol worship itself is not the
problem. The issue arises when people are drawn into temples for the wrong
reasons—manipulated by those who have turned faith into a business. The
proliferation of temples worldwide, often driven by profit motives, is a dangerous
trend that risks pulling society back into blind faith. Instead of building
more temples, churches, or other religious institutions, I believe we should
focus on creating more schools and universities—places that foster education,
critical thinking, and societal progress.
Conclusion
My opposition is not to Sanatan
Dharma or idol worship itself, but to its commercialization and the way it has
been exploited for personal and political gain. We must return to the true
essence of Sanatan Dharma—upholding dharma, fighting against adharma, and
promoting peace. Faith should not be commodified or used as a tool to deceive,
but should instead be a path toward genuine spiritual growth and the betterment
of society.
Modi ji started speaking about sanatan dharma in the world leaders conferences , very well liked. But he changed to Ram Mandir building in Ayodhya and left sanatan dharma. Voters punished him for that in the election.
ReplyDeletePrem Khera
I believe you may still be thinking that Modi was a true Sanatani until his actions in Ayodhya. However, my argument is that when he stood by and did nothing to protect innocent people during the Gujarat riots—and even Atal Bihari Vajpayee recognized this by saying Modi had abandoned his "Raj Dharma"—he ceased to be a Sanatani. Instead, he became an opportunist, willing to do whatever it took to advance his own position. His lies and corrupt methods may have kept him in power, but I would never call him a Sanatani, even if he gives speeches on Sanatan principles.
Delete