The Rise of Modi and The Fall of India
The Rise of Modi and The Fall of
India
In one of his trademark jibes,
Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently called Delhi Chief Minister Arvind
Kejriwal a "smart thief," suggesting that this is why no one has been
able to find any proof of his alleged corruption. Ah, yes, because when a thief
is smart, India’s mighty investigative agencies — with all their resources and
expertise — are rendered helpless. How convenient. With that single statement,
Modi may have unintentionally revealed more about his government’s inability to
gather evidence than about Kejriwal’s cleverness. Or perhaps he just confirmed
that his administration is, in fact, led by people incapable of tying their own
shoelaces without first forming a committee.
This brings us to a much larger
issue: the state of governance under Modi's leadership. If his government
cannot produce evidence to back the corruption charges against Kejriwal after
months of investigation, one must question the competency of these so-called
bureaucratic “geniuses” who are supposed to safeguard the nation from fraud.
Are they all playing hide-and-seek with the evidence, or is it possible that,
despite the pomp and posturing, there simply isn’t any?
It’s a tough time to be a
bureaucrat in India. Imagine the shame of working tirelessly to investigate
someone, only to be told by your own prime minister that the suspect is too
"smart" to be caught. Well, at least they can take solace in the fact
that being humiliated by their boss is just another day on the job.
And while we’re at it, let’s talk
about the revered figures that some of Modi’s most ardent followers,
particularly those from the RSS, worship. These include people like Vinayak
Damodar Savarkar, Nathuram Godse, and Subhas Chandra Bose. Now, a friend recently
pointed out that many of these individuals are celebrated despite their
undeniable failures. Losers, he called them. I had to admit, he had a point.
Savarkar, who begged the British for mercy. Godse, couldn’t see the irony in
“saving” India by assassinating Gandhi. Bose, whose Azad Hind army failed in
its mission. All of this makes perfect sense when you consider that the BJP and
RSS have lost something of an art form.
Of course, not every name on this
list of revered figures is deserving of such harsh criticism. Subhas Chandra
Bose, for example, may have lost his military battle, but he certainly did not
lose his place in history as a patriot. And then there’s Atal Bihari Vajpayee,
a respected statesman who, despite literally falling asleep on the job during
the Kargil War, is still regarded as one of India’s better leaders. But hey,
when the bar is set so low, even a nap can be forgiven.
Now we have Modi, the great
leader who has elevated this nation to new heights of, well, selling its assets
to corporate buddies while delivering speeches about nationalism. Under his
rule, India has seen the rise of privatization, where state-owned assets are
sold off to private companies, because why should the government manage the
country’s resources when they can be neatly handed over to billionaires
instead? After all, nothing screams "economic progress" quite like
stripping the country of its wealth and handing it to a select few in the name
of “development.”
The irony here is rich — no pun
intended. Modi, who rose to power on the promise of eradicating corruption and
safeguarding the nation’s wealth, now oversees the wholesale auctioning of
India’s resources to the highest bidder. And who benefits? Certainly not the
ordinary Indian. But don't worry, you’ll get a glitzy new statue or a stadium
renamed after him to remind you that nationalism, not your empty pockets, is
the true prize.
Let’s not forget Modi’s
masterclass in governance: demonetization. You know, that bold move that was
supposed to eradicate black money but ended up making half of India stand in
line for hours just to access their own money. Remember how that “war on black
money” turned out? It’s still missing, and apparently, so is the black money.
Modi's rise to power was built on
his image as a man of action — a leader who would clean up the system. But
after a decade in power, what has truly been accomplished? The promise of a
corruption-free India has fizzled out as most of the country’s allegedly
corrupt politicians have conveniently found their way into the BJP. If you
can’t beat them, join them, right? Well, in Modi’s India, if you’re corrupt,
you get a party membership.
Speaking of corruption, let’s
revisit the now infamous Delhi Liquor Scam. Despite all the bluster and
finger-pointing, no evidence has been produced to implicate Kejriwal. Not a
shred. If Modi’s government spent as much time governing as they do chasing phantom
evidence, maybe the country wouldn’t be in its current state. It’s almost as if
the whole investigation is nothing more than a poorly written plot twist in a
political soap opera — the kind where the villain is obvious, but the
scriptwriters are too lazy to provide a motive.
And yet, here we are, with Modi
proudly declaring that his own government, equipped with vast resources and
state machinery, can’t catch Kejriwal because he’s “too smart.” It’s a strange
kind of self-own, but it fits perfectly into the larger narrative of
incompetence that has come to define this administration.
Under Modi’s leadership, the
justice system has also become little more than a punchline. Once upon a time,
India prided itself on its legal institutions and commitment to fairness. Now,
the justice system operates more like a political tool — if you’re an
opposition leader, expect a knock on your door. If you’re in the BJP,
congratulations, you’ve just earned immunity from consequences.
As we watch the rise of Modi, we
also witness the fall of India — in every possible way. The economy, once
considered a rising global force, is now teetering on the edge. The social
fabric of the nation, once built on diversity and inclusion, is fraying under
the weight of division and hate speech. The country’s global standing, which
once promised so much potential, has been reduced to a caricature of
nationalism and crony capitalism.
But don’t worry, because in
Modi’s India, failure is a success, selling the country is patriotism, and
calling your opponents "smart thieves" is a valid political strategy.
After all, why govern when you can just blame everyone else? In the end, the
rise of Modi is inextricably linked with the fall of India. The two go hand in
hand. As we move forward, we must ask ourselves: how much more of India must
fall before the rise of Modi finally ends?
Comments
Post a Comment