India Launches Missile Strikes in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir: Questions Raised Over Motive and Impact

 

India Launches Missile Strikes in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir: Questions Raised Over Motive and Impact


May 6, 2025 – New Delhi/Islamabad

Today, India launched nine missile strikes on locations in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK). According to government sources, the strikes were aimed at terrorist training camps. According to just about everyone else, the targets were already empty. So, either the terrorists got lucky, or someone in New Delhi just wanted a flashy light show before elections in Bihar.

Western reports suggest the camps were cleared out days before the strike—meaning the only things India might have bombed were empty bunkers and maybe a couple of goats. It's almost as if someone tipped them off. Or—and here's a wild thought—maybe this was never about actual terrorists to begin with.

The timing, coincidentally (or not), comes right after the devastating terrorist attack in Pahalgam. That attack, now confirmed to have been preceded by intelligence warnings three days in advance, went unprevented because apparently, someone in Delhi thought “alert” meant “ignore and proceed with routine incompetence.” Security was actually reduced in the area. But don’t worry—no one in the Home Ministry has been held accountable. They're likely busy preparing campaign speeches or taking extended naps.

And yet, instead of fixing the intelligence mess or admitting that something went terribly wrong, the Modi government thought, “Why not launch some missiles?” Because nothing says “strong leadership” like bombing empty buildings and then acting like you just saved the nation.

Now, reports suggest civilians may have been killed in these strikes—something the government hasn’t confirmed, denied, or even acknowledged. But if true, it would turn this from a political stunt into something far uglier: a tragedy sold as strength. And if Pakistan only responds with loud statements and no military action, it’ll confirm what many already suspect—this was less about national security and more about election strategy.

In real counter-terror operations—like the U.S. hunt for Osama bin Laden—you wait, gather intel, confirm your targets, and then strike. You don’t rush into action with TV cameras rolling and party flags waving. But that requires patience, competence, and actual concern for results—none of which have been hallmarks of the current government.

As always, Modi’s administration will likely flood the airwaves with chest-thumping rhetoric and patriotic hashtags. But if innocent people have died, and no terrorists were hit, this wasn’t a show of power. It was a moral failure dressed up as a military operation.

One can only hope the government eventually tells the nation who they were after, why now, and what exactly they think they accomplished—besides giving Modi one more thing to yell about in his next rally.

Comments

  1. How come the opposition went along with this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tell me what choice the opposition had in this, have more pressure talking against them in this toxic environment?

      Delete
  2. The problem is who got us into this mess, historically. The answer is Gandhi Nehru and the Congress party, including all their cronies. Even bigger problem is posts like this which attack the government that has actually done good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah yes, the classic “blame Nehru” reflex—triggered before breakfast, endorsed by WhatsApp University, and powered by zero historical context.
      Let’s clarify a few things for those who skipped their history lessons:
      1. India wasn’t one country in 1947. It was a fragmented union of over 560 princely states. Kashmir was one of them. It legally acceded to India when Raja Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession in October 1947 after Pakistan-backed tribal invaders attacked. That’s not Nehru’s fault. That’s basic history. If that’s too complex, try Google before forwarding your next “Pappu” meme.
      2. The British were still effectively in control in 1947. Lord Mountbatten was overseeing the transition, and British officers still served in both Indian and Pakistani forces. Who greenlit the attack on Kashmir? Great question. Maybe ask the empire you're now idolizing through Western alliances.
      3. Modi has had 11 years, a supermajority, global goodwill, and zero domestic opposition to taking bold action on Kashmir. He removed Article 370 (at least on paper). Yet when the time came to actually resolve the issue—diplomatically, militarily, or strategically—he blinked. So, who's in charge now? Nehru's ghost?
      4. “Attacking the government that has actually done good”—Sure, as long as you define "good" as press censorship, security lapses, and turning war into a campaign rally. Holding leaders accountable isn't unpatriotic—it's what real democracies do. If that bothers you, maybe you’re more comfortable in a WhatsApp group than in a republic.
      You can keep blaming Nehru for everything from Kashmir to your Wi-Fi going out. But facts are facts—and sadly, Modi’s legacy on Kashmir is starting to look a lot like the failures he promised to fix.
      But I get it—it’s hard to install logic once the WhatsApp firmware is fully updated.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How We Turned an Abstract God into Concrete Hate

Distraction as Governance: How a Scripted National Song Debate Shielded the SIR Controversy

Superstitions: Where Do They Come From, and Why Do People Believe in Them?