The Soul of a Nation: Remembering What We’ve Forgotten
The Soul of a Nation: Remembering
What We’ve Forgotten
Faced of Hate
Most people around the world want the same thing: to live
their lives in peace, free from conflict, fear, and hate. Yet even in times of
abundance, humans find reasons to fight. Greed kicks in—because for some,
enough is never enough. That hunger for more—more power, more wealth, more
control—often pushes societies into chaos. But it wasn’t always like this.
If we look back to ancient India, particularly during the
Vedic period, we find a society that seemed to understand something we’ve
forgotten. Long before institutional religion, before kings ruled with divine
rights, before borders were drawn on maps, there existed a culture where life
wasn’t about domination. It was about dialogue.
The Vedas, especially the Rig Veda, weren’t written
overnight. They were a collection of evolving thoughts, debated and refined by
scholars over centuries. Passed down orally, these ideas reflected a
civilization deeply interested in understanding—not controlling—life, nature,
and existence. There were no clear definitions of God, no rigid commandments.
The divine was a mystery, intentionally left open to interpretation. That’s
because the early Vedic thinkers weren’t obsessed with having answers. They were
more concerned with asking the right questions. What is life? What happens
after death? Is there a higher power? If so, what is it? They used language
like Nirakaar, meaning “formless,” to describe what they felt but
couldn’t see or touch. These weren’t just theological ideas; they were
psychological tools—ways to cope with loss, grief, and the unpredictability of
life.
The Vedic era wasn’t ruled by dogma. It was guided by a
flexible moral compass. Things weren’t always labeled as strictly right or
wrong. Ideas were debated. Values shifted when someone presented a better
argument. There were no strict definitions of family or rigid social roles.
It’s entirely possible—and some evidence suggests—that open relationships and
fluid gender roles existed in this era, allowing both men and women to live
more freely. It’s telling that we find little record of violent conflict during
this time in that region. Maybe people were too busy trying to understand what
made them happy, and how to coexist peacefully. With minimal material needs,
society focused more on internal development than external conquest.
Even symbols that later became religious—like the sacred
Peepal tree—began as practical choices. It provided shade for travelers and was
later found to release oxygen even at night, unlike most trees. Leaves were
used to serve food. Wisdom often came from what simply worked. In Vedic
society, the highest pursuit wasn’t power. It was realization. Discussions were
likely long, sometimes intoxicating, as they cracked open people’s minds to
ideas that couldn’t be proven, only felt. Concepts like karma and Brahman
weren’t designed to control people. They were attempts to give meaning to the
cycles of life and death. The pain of death, after all, didn’t begin in modern
times. It has always existed. And with pain, humans have always sought
healing—first through ritual, and later through philosophy.
Even the Buddha’s story is rooted in these existential
questions. Siddhartha Gautama was unsatisfied with the answers he received
about suffering, birth, and death. So he went searching. His enlightenment,
under the very tree that would later become sacred, marked the shift from
open-ended inquiry to a more structured spiritual system—what we now call
Buddhism. As societies grew, so did complexity. Agriculture led to surplus.
Surplus led to ownership. Ownership led to power structures. And slowly, spiritual
curiosity was replaced by religious authority. Questions were replaced by
answers. The humility of the Vedic sages gave way to the certainty of empires
and kings. But more dangerously, fear crept in.
The fear of losing what one has. The fear that someone else
might get more. The fear that your beliefs, your way of life, your culture, is
under threat. These fears became tools. And the most effective tool of all?
Division. Modern politics runs on fear. Politicians don’t need to offer
solutions anymore. They just need to create enemies. “The immigrants are taking
your jobs.” “The liberals are destroying your values.” “The rich are out to get
you.” “The poor are dragging you down.” The message is always the same: be
afraid of them. It’s a psychological trick. Fear creates urgency. Urgency
short-circuits logic. It makes people cling to the familiar, and more
importantly, it makes them easier to control. And today’s information ecosystem
makes it worse. Social media rewards outrage. Nuance gets lost. Algorithms push
us into echo chambers where everything we hear just reinforces what we already
believe. Doubt—a sacred force in Vedic thought—has now become suspect.
Questioning your side means betrayal. Listening to the other side means
weakness.
In contrast, the Vedic tradition encouraged debate. It didn’t
fear opposing views. It welcomed them. It asked people to sit together, to
speak, to listen. The goal wasn’t to win. It was to understand. Greed often
masks fear. We want more not because we need more, but because we fear not
having enough—of money, status, security, respect. But the Vedic sages knew
that none of these things last. They didn’t build their lives around
accumulation. They built their lives around meaning. Today, we fear the unknown.
We fear death, failure, change. So we cling to whatever makes us feel
powerful—even if that power comes at the cost of compassion or truth.
But the Vedic model still offers a path forward. Not by
copying the past, but by remembering its principles: that truth is never final,
that peace is more valuable than pride, and that the soul of a nation is
defined not by what it owns or fears, but by what it seeks to understand. Look
around the world today—India, America, Europe. A disturbing pattern is
emerging. Hate has become a political tool. Fear is no longer just a
byproduct—it’s a strategy. In India, religious minorities are being pushed out
of the national conversation. In America, immigration enforcement has become a
theater of cruelty. Legal residents, even citizens, are being harassed based on
skin color, accent, or surname.
ICE raids, family separations, the targeting of vulnerable
people trying to survive—these are not isolated incidents. They’re symptoms of
a broader fear machine. It is shameful that one of the most powerful, wealthy
nations on earth is terrified of hungry, homeless people seeking help. But it’s
not really about fear. It’s about control. Power loves a scapegoat. In India,
citizens are being told who counts as "real" Indians. In America,
people are told to “go back” even if they were born here. The strategy is
clear: define who belongs, then criminalize the rest. And all it takes is a
small group in power, armed with money and media, to manipulate that fear.
Think about what happens when the world stays silent. Hitler
rose to power not just through violence, but through a silence that echoed
around him. Stalin’s purges were enabled by fear, by neighbors too afraid to
speak up. Millions were killed—Jews, dissenters, dreamers—because those with
voices chose safety over justice. We no longer have the excuse of ignorance. We
live in an age of real-time information. We see hate happening. We see who is
targeted. We hear their voices. We see the footage. So why are we still quiet?
Is this the world we want to live in? Are we going to let
history repeat itself?
The soul of a nation is not its economy, its military, or
even its religion. It’s in how its people think. It’s in whether they can hold
space for disagreement, respect complexity, and refuse to let fear dictate
their lives. What we need today isn’t more rules or more walls. We need more
conversation. More curiosity. More willingness to say, “I don’t know,” and keep
asking the deeper questions. Like those early sages, we need to be brave enough
to seek—not just what is easy or profitable—but what is true.
We don’t need to go back to the Vedic times. But we do need
to reclaim their spirit: the openness to learn, the courage to question, the
humility to admit we’re still figuring it out. If we don’t—if we stay quiet
while the powerful sow division—we’re not just letting others get hurt. We’re
letting our own humanity erode.
So, think about it. Share this. Start a conversation. Because
silence never saved a soul—and it won’t save this one either.
Comments
Post a Comment