Justice Weaponized: Why Injustice Wrapped in Religion Fuels the Fire in Kashmir and POK
Note: This article is an opinion piece based on interpretations and historical conjectures that align with the author's point of view.
Justice Weaponized: Why Injustice
Wrapped in Religion Fuels the Fire in Kashmir and POK
Some conflicts aren’t unsolvable;
they’re intentionally left unsolved. Kashmir is one of them. Like Palestine.
Like systemic racism. Like apartheid. At the heart of each lies a common
thread: injustice, not just its presence, but its purposeful misuse to divide,
control, and profit.
Injustice does not discriminate, but
once it is dressed in religious or ethnic colors, it becomes a weapon that
does. The world has seen this story before. When Jews were dehumanized in
Europe, millions perished while the world rationalized it. When Blacks were
enslaved, segregated, and brutalized for centuries, systems justified it as
“order.” Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs all have suffered when justice was denied
or delivered selectively. When one group’s pain is dismissed, when injustice is
seen through a sectarian lens, it creates a moral blindness that paves the way
for more bloodshed.
This is exactly how the conflict
in Kashmir has endured, not because of people’s hatred, but because of
political systems and elites that manipulate pain, wrap it in religious
language, and feed it back to their own populations as a battle cry.
The Kashmir and Pakistan-occupied
Kashmir (POK) conflict has persisted not because it can't be resolved, but
because it continues to benefit those in power. On both sides. Pakistan’s
deeply feudal structure uses Kashmir as a rallying cry while denying basic
rights to its own people. India, for decades, enabled corrupt regional leaders
in Kashmir who spoke the language of autonomy while practicing the politics of
self-preservation.
These leaders, often from
dynastic political families, exploited the grievances of their people to
bargain with Delhi, while doing little to deliver education, justice, or
opportunity on the ground. And when they invoked religion to explain injustice,
they poisoned the well. Not just for Muslims. But for Hindus, Sikhs, and others
who also call Kashmir home and have suffered some through targeted violence,
others through displacement, alienation, and fear.
Once pain becomes communalized,
people stop seeing each other as fellow victims of a broken system. Instead,
they begin to believe that only their suffering is real, and that the suffering
of others is either deserved or invented. That’s when mobs rise. That’s when
bullets replace dialogue. And that’s when the fight for justice turns into a
cycle of vengeance.
The consequences have been
devastating. Militancy after 1989 was not just Pakistan’s doing. It was enabled
by broken promises, internal misgovernance, and the strategic silence of those
who should have acted earlier. And while many Kashmiris were recruited into
separatist causes, many others, including Kashmiri Pandits, were driven from
their homes, scarred for life by violence the system failed to prevent or
condemn.
In 2019, when Article 370 was
revoked, it triggered a fierce debate. But it also broke a political
stranglehold. For the first time, entrenched elites could no longer claim moral
high ground while delivering nothing. And many ordinary Kashmiri Hindus and Muslims
began asking different questions: What if justice could be delivered without
bias? What if identity didn’t determine your access to opportunity?
Wherever fairness has been
applied, people have responded. Kashmiris, including former skeptics, have
shown support for law enforcement and institutions not because they were forced
to, but because they felt respected.
Across the border in POK, the
situation is no better. The people are voiceless, used as props for a political
narrative, denied rights, and promised a dream that never comes. They are not
enemies; they are equally betrayed by power structures that weaponize their
existence.
And while this continues, China
has capitalized on the distraction. The Shimla Agreement of 1972 promised
bilateral resolution. But decades of squabbling and misrule opened the door for
a third party. China has now physically occupied parts of Ladakh and POK without
firing a shot. While Indians and Pakistanis debate faith and flags, China is
redrawing the map.
Who suffers? Not the elite. Not
the feudal class. But the ordinary citizens are told to fight each other while
their land, their future, and their peace are quietly stolen.
This is not just an Indian or
Pakistani story. It’s a global one. Because everywhere injustice becomes
politicized, someone profits, and everyone else pays. The poor, the
marginalized, the forgotten, they all carry the cost of wars they never asked
for.
The people of Kashmir are not
asking for power. They are asking for dignity, the same dignity that Black
Americans fought for in Selma, that Jews demanded after the Holocaust, that
Dalits fight for every day in India, that Palestinians demand in Gaza. Justice
has no religion. Neither does pain.
If any political system claims to
represent its people, it must represent all its people. Equally. Without favor.
Without excuse.
Because peace without justice is
just a ceasefire, and when the smoke clears, the land and the soul of a nation may
already be lost.
All migrations throughout history have been driven by one fundamental need, the search for safety and a better life. When a government can provide unbiased and fair justice, people feel safe and rooted. The situation in Kashmir reflects what happens when that safety is missing. Generations have lived in fear, even when those in power shared their religion or language. The problem was never just about identity; it was about the absence of justice. When people are suffocated long enough, their reactions stop following societal norms. But those reactions are not acts of hatred; they are cries for breath.
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/pWdPBdQI47Y?si=KmdwUTN-OgbiD9ij
DeleteIn this video where Ajay has done a great job explaining the Kashmir issue.