Blind Faith: The National Addiction Nobody Wants to Cure
Blind Faith: The National Addiction Nobody Wants to Cure
There’s blindness, and then there’s the far more dangerous
condition of being blinded by faith. Blind people have built companies, written
books, conquered mountains, mastered music, and inspired entire generations.
But people blinded by faith, political or religious, have repeatedly destroyed
societies while convincing themselves they were saving them. One group learns
to navigate darkness. The other worships it.
Human beings love history, but only the parts that flatter
them. We proudly quote freedom fighters, philosophers, reformers, and
revolutionaries whenever it helps us sound intellectual on social media. But
the moment history exposes the crimes committed by fanatics, mobs, political
loyalists, or religious extremists, suddenly everyone becomes uncomfortable.
Every ideology has its own laundry department dedicated to washing bloodstains
into patriotism. Atrocities become “complicated.” Lies become “sentiments.”
Violence becomes “emotion.” Accountability disappears under the sacred
protection of blind loyalty.
The truly frightening thing about blind faith is that facts
become completely useless against it. Evidence means nothing. Logic becomes
offensive. A person consumed by faith will reject reality itself before
admitting they were misled. You can show reports, statistics, videos,
investigations, court records, and eyewitness accounts, and they will still
dismiss everything because some random WhatsApp forward told them otherwise. We
are living in an era where forwarded messages have more credibility than journalists,
researchers, or even basic common sense.
India today feels like a giant laboratory where this
experiment has gone horribly right. Question those in power, and you are
instantly treated as though you attacked the nation itself. Criticize policies,
and suddenly you are “anti-national.” Ask where the promises went, and people
react as if you insulted their religion. Democracy now operates like a customer
feedback form where only positive reviews are allowed. Anything else is
considered treason.
And perhaps nothing exposes this collapse more brutally than
the endless exam paper leaks destroying the future of millions of students.
Today, once again, the NEET exam finds itself surrounded by allegations of
paper leaks and organized corruption. One more year. One more scandal. One more
generation told to “work hard” while criminals cash out their future before the
exam even begins.
Since the BJP came to power, dozens upon dozens of
recruitment and examination papers have reportedly leaked across the country.
Competitive exams, government jobs, entrance tests, eligibility exams, one
after another, turning the dreams of students into a national joke. Millions of
young people spend years studying under unbearable pressure, only to discover
that the real qualification in modern India is not merit, but access. Access to
leaked papers. Access to corrupt networks. Access to political protection.
And what is truly astonishing is not just the leaks
themselves, but the complete normalization of them. Students protest. Families
cry. Investigations are announced. A few small players are arrested for the
cameras. Then the system quietly moves on as though destroying careers and
mental health is just another administrative inconvenience.
Meanwhile, there are repeated accusations that powerful
political figures and networks continue to shelter or protect the very people
running these rackets. Yet elections continue to be won comfortably because
blind faith is stronger than accountability. A student can lose years of
preparation, a family can lose savings, an entire generation can lose faith in
fairness itself, and still millions will vote emotionally because someone
shouted “Hindutva” loudly enough on television.
That is the genius of identity politics. Steal the future,
then distract the victims with religion.
Nothing captures this absurdity better than the endless
political performance around the idea of a “drug-free India.” The speeches are
dramatic, the slogans are loud, and the election posters are large enough to be
seen from space. Every politician suddenly transforms into a warrior against
addiction during campaign season. Yet somehow, nobody wants to discuss how
deeply drug networks survive under political protection across the country.
It’s the political equivalent of a mosquito running an anti-malaria campaign.
Take Gujarat, proudly advertised as a “dry state.”
Officially, alcohol is banned. Unofficially, alcohol is available with such
efficiency that one could argue prohibition has simply become a
government-sponsored networking exercise. The state loses enormous tax revenue
while illegal liquor markets thrive comfortably in the shadows. Naturally, when
unregulated alcohol kills people, authorities perform the usual ritual: express
sadness, announce investigations, arrest a few expendable faces, and quietly move
on once the headlines fade. It is governance by theater, where symbolism
matters more than outcomes.
Meanwhile, the consequences land on ordinary citizens.
Hospitals deal with accidents, poisonings, violence, and injuries linked to
substance abuse, while the state loses revenue that could have funded
healthcare, education, or infrastructure. But instead of admitting that failed
policies create thriving black markets, politicians continue selling morality
as public policy. Apparently, pretending a problem doesn’t exist is now
considered leadership.
And then there’s the grand hypocrisy surrounding hard drugs.
Massive seizures occasionally appear in the news. Television anchors scream for
two days straight. Politicians demand investigations with great patriotic
energy. Social media erupts. Then suddenly, silence. The stories vanish faster
than accountability whenever powerful names enter the conversation. Questions
about political connections, administrative failures, or influential business
interests evaporate overnight. The public is expected to forget everything by
the next news cycle and return to arguing over hashtags and movie boycotts.
Of course, this silence does not happen naturally. It is
carefully managed by what people now openly call the “Godi media,” large
sections of national media that behave less like journalists and more like
official PR departments. Their job is not to investigate power, but to protect
it. Prime-time debates are reduced to shouting competitions designed to
distract people from unemployment, corruption, paper leaks, drug networks,
economic failures, and institutional decay. Real stories disappear under manufactured
outrage, celebrity gossip, religious polarization, and nightly nationalism
performances complete with dramatic background music. Apparently, journalism in
modern India now means asking the government difficult questions like, “Sir,
how do you work so hard for the nation?”
And even when serious allegations emerge around stolen votes,
electoral irregularities, or delayed investigations, the system moves with the
speed of a sleeping buffalo. Hundreds of cases sit waiting in courts while
elections come and go. Justice delayed becomes justice denied, especially when
the delay itself protects the powerful. By the time hearings happen, the damage
is already complete, governments are formed, careers are destroyed, and public
memory has been carefully redirected toward the next emotional distraction.
The real tragedy is not corruption itself. Corruption has
existed forever. The real tragedy is watching ordinary people passionately
defend systems that are actively damaging their own lives. Students lose
opportunities. Families lose savings. Young people lose hope. Yet people
continue cheering for leaders who speak endlessly about religion while quietly
stealing the future of the very people worshipping them.
At some point, society must ask itself a difficult question:
when are people going to wake up to the reality that they are being led by
leaders who survive not on governance, but on emotional manipulation? Leaders
who keep people busy fighting cultural wars while unemployment rises,
institutions weaken, education collapses, and corruption spreads like a
disease.
Blind faith is the greatest political weapon ever invented
because it eliminates the need for accountability. A thinking citizen asks
questions. A faithful follower attacks whoever asks them. That is the
transformation modern politics desperately wants. Not informed citizens. Not
critical thinkers. Just emotionally charged supporters trained to confuse
loyalty with intelligence.
At some point, reality itself becomes inconvenient. Truth
becomes offensive. Facts become propaganda. And the greatest irony of all is
that people trapped in this blindness genuinely believe they are the
enlightened ones.
That is the terrifying power of blind faith. It convinces
victims to protect the very system that is hurting them, while proudly calling
it patriotism.
Comments
Post a Comment