If These Students Are Terrorists, Then What Is Left of Democracy?
If These Students Are Terrorists,
Then What Is Left of Democracy?
Over the past few days, India has witnessed a disturbing
spectacle at Jantar Mantar.
Young students, many of whom claim to have spent years
preparing for examinations and government jobs, have gathered to protest
examination scandals, paper leaks, and what they see as the systematic collapse
of accountability in India's education system. The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP),
led by Abhijeet Dipke, has transformed what began as online satire into a
nationwide youth movement demanding answers from those in power. Reports from
the protest site show students holding discussions, building a small library,
distributing books, and demanding accountability through peaceful
demonstrations. (The
Times of India)
Yet instead of addressing the questions being raised, the
focus appears to have shifted toward controlling, restricting, and discrediting
the protesters.
One of the most troubling incidents reported from Jantar
Mantar involved individuals attempting to bring water and food to protesters
being subjected to Aadhaar verification checks. When challenged, Delhi Police
officials initially denied such reports. However, after videos emerged,
questions were raised publicly, leading to assurances that such incidents would
not continue. During one exchange, Abhijeet Dipke was heard asking a question
that resonated with many observers:
"Do people need a visa to come to Jantar Mantar?" (The
Times of India)
It is a fair question. Jantar Mantar is not a military
installation. It is not a restricted security zone. It is one of the few
designated places in the national capital where citizens can exercise their
democratic right to protest.
If citizens require identification checks simply to provide
water to peaceful demonstrators, then the issue is no longer merely about law
and order. It becomes a question about the shrinking space available for
democratic dissent.
Even more troubling are reports and videos circulating online
that show confrontations and alleged assaults involving protesters. Many
participants and observers have accused supporters of the ruling party of
attempting to intimidate students. Whether every allegation is proven or not,
the larger question remains unanswered:
Why are students protesting educational failures finding
themselves in physical confrontations at all?
If the state can deploy extensive police forces, drones,
cameras, barricades, and surveillance around Jantar Mantar, surely it can also
ensure that peaceful protesters are protected from intimidation and violence. (www.ndtv.com)
The most shocking development, however, may have come from
the political response itself.
According to widely circulated reports and video clips, Union
Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan referred to the movement in terms that
protesters interpreted as linking them to terrorism. The response from the
students was immediate and emotional. Many asked a simple question:
When students demand accountability for paper leaks,
unemployment, and educational corruption, how do they become terrorists? (The Times
of India)
This is where the government may be making a serious
political mistake. Governments rarely fear a few hundred students sitting at
Jantar Mantar. What governments fear is the possibility that those students
represent millions of frustrated young Indians who feel ignored.
A student in Bihar understands paper leaks. A student in
Uttar Pradesh understands recruitment delays. A student in Karnataka
understands unemployment. A student in Punjab understands the growing gap
between education and opportunity. This movement is dangerous to the political
establishment not because it is violent, but because it speaks a language that
millions of young Indians understand.
For years, political battles in India have been fought around
religion, caste, region, and identity. The CJP has shifted the conversation
toward something far more difficult for politicians to manage:
jobs, examinations, corruption, and accountability. Those
issues do not divide young people. They unite them. That is why the protests
matter. That is why every attempt to ridicule them matters. That is why every
attempt to intimidate them matters.
And that is why every Indian whether they support the BJP,
Congress, AAP, the Left, or no party at all should be concerned when peaceful
protesters are treated as enemies rather than citizens.
Democracy does not die when governments face criticism. Democracy
dies when governments begin seeing criticism itself as a threat. If students
asking questions become "terrorists," then India faces a much larger
problem than examination leaks. It faces a crisis of democratic accountability
itself.
Comments
Post a Comment