Why Bother Voting? The Election’s Already Been Decided!

 

Why Bother Voting? The Election’s Already Been Decided!

Modi’s Hand-picked Spineless ECI

This article calls for a boycott of future elections, focusing on the relentless erosion of India’s electoral integrity. If the Election Commission of India (ECI)—the supposed guardian of democracy—fails to deliver fair elections that earn public trust, then elections risk devolving into mere formalities. When opposition parties, which reflect the richness of India's diversity, cannot rely on the ECI to guarantee a level playing field, the entire democratic structure trembles. If India’s elections are fated to follow the path of predetermined regimes, as in Russia or China, perhaps it's time to accept the “God’s gift” of governance and call it a day.

In a truly democratic society, election integrity is non-negotiable. The ECI’s role should be to uphold justice equally, scrutinizing both the ruling party and the opposition to ensure unbiased governance. However, when the ECI appears to shy away from enforcing rules or holding power accountable, it sends a disheartening message to citizens and opposition parties alike: their participation may simply be a ceremonial gesture. India’s democratic process, thus, risks becoming a mere façade, with outcomes already shadowed by suspicion before any votes are cast.

Even more surprising is the public’s persistent faith in a judicial system long clouded by allegations of bias. The recent admission of biases by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) raised eyebrows across the nation, especially in the context of his failures to address election integrity. His inaction has created a justice vacuum that echoes through the corridors of democracy, leaving citizens questioning whether the highest courts now serve the people or power. If personal beliefs and confessions replace objective law, perhaps it’s time to wonder if the next confession should be made at a mental health clinic rather than on a national platform.

For citizens, the disillusionment doesn’t end with the ECI or even the judiciary. Courts, as the ultimate gatekeepers of justice, are tasked with protecting democratic principles. Their silence or selective action on matters of electoral integrity erodes the very essence of public confidence. When institutions charged with upholding democracy fail to act in its defense, it signals that public trust, once broken, will struggle to be mended.

In nations where democracy has been compromised, history has shown that citizens often rise to demand accountability. They urge transparency and integrity through marches, protests, and civil disobedience. India’s fragmented opposition, however, has yet to consolidate a united front against these growing inequities. Should a coalition emerge to challenge the status quo, it may place the ECI under unprecedented pressure to prioritize transparency and fairness, realigning the electoral process with public interest. Until then, India’s democracy remains compromised, vulnerable to a future where voting may be a foregone conclusion.

For all who care about a genuine democratic system, demanding fair elections transcends political maneuvering; it is about reclaiming the voice and dignity of the people.