BJP’s Rigged Democracy: How India’s Ruling Party Steals Elections While the Opposition Watches
BJP’s Rigged Democracy: How India’s
Ruling Party Steals Elections While the Opposition Watches
In a moment of rare assertiveness, the Leader of the
Opposition recently stood up in Parliament and raised the issue of election
fraud, forcing the ruling party to at least acknowledge the growing concerns
over manipulated voter data and rigged elections. After sustained pressure, the
Election Commission of India reluctantly announced changes to the voter
registration process, claiming these reforms would bring more transparency.
But does anyone truly believe the Election Commission
suddenly developed a sense of fairness? The BJP-controlled system does not
correct itself; it simply finds new ways to disguise its manipulation. These
"reforms" could just as easily be another layer of deception,
creating an illusion of integrity while ensuring that the backdoor mechanisms
of election fraud remain intact. The only real question is what kind of rigging
strategy is being cooked up in private meetings as the opposition celebrates
this supposed victory.
And yet, here is the opposition, acting as if these small
procedural tweaks are a major breakthrough for democracy. It is almost painful
to watch them take credit for forcing minimal changes while ignoring the fact
that the BJP has already perfected the art of election theft. The evidence has
been right in front of them for years, and yet they continue to miss
opportunity after opportunity.
The Chandigarh Mayor election was a blatant example of
electoral fraud. The votes were openly tampered with to secure a BJP victory.
The Supreme Court had to step in, expose the fraud, and reinstate the actual
winner from the Aam Aadmi Party. That should have been the moment when the
opposition went all out. The vote counter who manipulated the results should
have been arrested and interrogated, the case should have been dragged through
every legal and political avenue, and the mastermind behind the operation
should have been exposed.
But what did the opposition do? Nothing. They treated it like
just another news cycle, let the guilty walk away, and moved on. If they cannot
even capitalize on a proven case of election fraud, how do they expect to
challenge the far more complex and sophisticated rigging happening in state and
national elections?
The case of former Election Commissioner Rajeev Kumar is yet
another example of their failure. He presided over multiple elections where the
BJP won under highly suspicious circumstances, from national elections to state
polls in Haryana, Maharashtra, and Delhi. Yet, instead of calling for his
prosecution or an independent inquiry, the opposition let him slip away,
allowing the ruling party to strengthen its grip over the electoral machinery
even further.
Then there was the complete mockery of democracy in the
Panchayat elections in Uttar Pradesh. Reports of voter suppression, violence,
and blatant manipulation flooded in. If the opposition had any real strategy,
they would have used this case to demand fresh elections in at least three
states where BJP victories were suspicious. But, as always, they let another
golden opportunity pass.
If the goal of the party in power is to rig the system so
much that the public no longer believes in any system, knowing that it has been
rigged, then the BJP is doing a wonderful job. They have successfully
dismantled the idea of free and fair elections, replacing it with a system
where people participate in the illusion of democracy while knowing full well
that the outcome has been pre-decided. And while their supporters may cheer
now, they will one day regret their blind faith. When their own children and
grandchildren grow up in a country where elections are meaningless, where
leaders are chosen by an elite cabal rather than by the people, they will be
left to answer for their stupidity. They will be forced to explain why they
allowed corruption to destroy one of the world’s largest and most successful
democracies.
The reality is that simply pointing out BJP’s corruption is
not a strategy. The opposition needs to do more than just talk. They must pick
key cases where fraud has already been exposed and hammer them relentlessly.
These cases must be kept alive in public discourse, pushed through every legal
and political channel, and made a central issue in rallies and campaigns. The
BJP must not be allowed to walk away from these crimes without consequences.
Instead, the opposition seems content to issue press
statements and hold a few panel discussions, as if that will be enough to
counter a government that has systematically taken over every democratic
institution. While they wait for justice to miraculously appear, the BJP
continues to tighten its control over the electoral process, the media, and the
judiciary.
India is now functioning under an undeclared Emergency. The
institutions that were once meant to safeguard democracy have been reduced to
tools for consolidating power. The President of India, once a respected
constitutional authority, has been turned into a mere puppet, following a
script dictated by the ruling party leadership. The judiciary, once considered
the last line of defense, is increasingly seen as compromised, with key
verdicts aligning suspiciously well with the interests of those in power.
The recent retirement of one of the most controversial Chief
Justices should have been an opportunity to restore faith in the judiciary, but
instead, it has only reinforced the public’s growing doubt over whether justice
is still possible in a system where money and political influence decide
outcomes.
The opposition still has a chance to fight back, but it must
abandon its passive approach. They have the evidence, the public sentiment, and
the legal grounds to challenge the ruling party on election fraud. But that
requires real action, not just press conferences and Twitter outrage. If they
continue to treat election theft as just another political inconvenience, they
may as well accept their fate as permanent spectators in a rigged democracy.
Comments
Post a Comment