Modi: The Unqualified Genius India Never Deserved
Modi: The Unqualified Genius India Never
Deserved
गरम सिंदूर इसकी रगों में दौड़ रहा है
In my entire life of witnessing political trainwrecks, I have
never, and I mean never, seen a Prime Minister so exquisitely
unqualified for the job as Narendra Modi. And no, this isn't bias speaking.
This is pure, unfiltered awe at how someone can so confidently set new world
records for cluelessness.
Take the terrorist attack in Kashmir. A serious moment for
the country, so naturally, Modi responded with Operation Sindhoor. Yes,
Sindhoor. Not Shakti, not Veer, but Sindhoor, the red powder
traditionally applied by a husband to his wife’s hair parting during marriage
rituals. Nothing screams military strength quite like bridal cosmetics.
Modi’s plan? Revenge. Against whom? Details are fuzzy. But
don't worry, the media, ever the dutiful hype machine, spun the story so hard
you’d think India had already annexed half of Pakistan. Reality check: India
lost five planes. Yep. Five. Then, like a cherry on top of this disaster
sundae, Donald Trump, international expert on peace and tact, called for a
ceasefire. Bravo.
But Modi, never one to let failure dim his poetic soul,
declared that a “warm Sindhoor” was coursing through his veins. Because when
the country is staring at military embarrassment, what really boosts morale is
a bizarre wedding metaphor.
And he wasn’t done. No sir. In a dazzling move of
nationalistic genius, Modi decided it would be a good idea to send packets of
Sindhoor to every Indian household, a substance that, let’s remember, is
traditionally meant to be applied by a husband to his wife. Not exactly
the symbol you want to mass-mail during a military crisis. Shockingly, the
public wasn’t thrilled at the idea of turning a deeply personal ritual into a
cheap political gimmick. People were less inspired and more ready to riot.
Sensing imminent disaster (again), the BJP quietly shelved the plan, pretending
it never happened, much like they do with most of Modi's ideas after they
backfire.
Meanwhile, another gem: delegations sent across the globe to
“explain” why India did what it did. Because nothing screams strength like
running a worldwide PR campaign to justify your actions. International
audiences must have been thrilled to watch India explain itself like a guilty
teenager caught sneaking out.
While all this was happening, Modi, the champion of austerity,
was busy investing public money where it counts: his personal grooming and PR
machine. Foundation, lighting, wardrobe, essentials, really. After all, if you
can’t lead effectively, at least look the part. And the media? Happily
swimming in the cash flow, too busy composing hymns to Modi’s greatness to
bother with real journalism.
As for facing actual questions from the public or the few
surviving real reporters? Please. Modi was nowhere to be seen, likely holed up
in some makeup room, perfecting his next photoshoot.
So, there you have it. India’s leader: brilliant at
pageantry, disastrous at governance, undefeated in the sport of dodging
accountability. What an inspiration.
Modi is elected prime minister of India, the largest democracy in the world, 4 times bigger in population than US and fourteen languages and diverse cultures., you need a super man to run the country with so many opposition parties. Sindhoor operation name is only reminder about how many women lost their sindhoor. Voters can elect a new leader.It wouldn’t like XI or Trump.
ReplyDeleteDid you even read the blog? Or are you just here to throw around clichés about “largest democracy” without any grasp of the details?
DeleteLet’s get a few things straight: Modi didn’t win a clear majority. He cobbled together a coalition by bargaining with smaller parties, hardly the sweeping mandate you’re pretending it was. And while we’re talking about democracy, maybe don’t forget the widespread questions raised about voter manipulation and election irregularities. Being installed through backroom deals and questionable tactics isn’t the same as being elected by the people in the way a real democracy demands.
As for your point about needing a "Superman" to run India: Dr. Manmohan Singh managed the same India, same diversity, same political chaos, and oversaw seven strikes inside Pakistan between 2008 and 2011 without using them as propaganda. He didn’t burn down national unity to boost his image. He led without turning serious issues into TV drama.
If you had read the blog, you’d have seen it wasn’t about hating Modi, it was about questioning his competence and the circus he’s made out of governance. Maybe read it before you try defending what can’t be defended.