The Fall of the Yogi: How Modi’s India Turned Faith Into Fascism
The Fall of the Yogi: How Modi’s
India Turned Faith Into Fascism
On October 2, 2025, Hari Om
Valmiki, a 38-year-old Dalit man from Rae Bareli, was lynched by a mob who
accused him of stealing a drone. He wasn’t carrying one. There was no evidence,
just rumors, caste hatred, and a deadly mob that beat him to death in broad
daylight. But the horror didn’t end with his murder; it escalated with the
state’s response. Rather than deliver justice, the Uttar Pradesh government
locked down Hari Om’s grieving family. Police surrounded their home, dictated
who they could and couldn’t meet, and pressured them to record a video discouraging
visits from political leaders. When Rahul Gandhi defied the blockade and went
to meet the family, they clung to him in tears. They wept not for the cameras,
but because someone in power finally listened. Someone finally stood with them.
That moment shattered the carefully staged image of order and control. It
exposed a regime that fears compassion more than it fears crime.
And perhaps most revealing was
who they tried to stop: Rahul Gandhi. His presence alone was treated like a
threat. The Uttar Pradesh administration didn’t just fear protests or political
speeches; they feared a hug, a tear, a moment of truth breaking through their
PR machinery. Because these days, just the mention of Rahul Gandhi brings
visible panic to the BJP leadership. He doesn’t need to shout. He doesn’t need
to smear. His power lies in the contrast of simply showing up where the BJP
refuses to go. That is why the state barricades grieving families when he
comes. That is why Narendra Modi repeatedly skips parliamentary sessions when
Rahul is present. This isn’t political rivalry. It’s the fear of a man who
walks calmly through the wreckage they’ve left behind and forces the nation to
look at it.
This is what Uttar Pradesh has
become under Adityanath’s rule: a state where brutality is covered with
silence, where the oppressed are isolated, and where the powerful are shielded.
And this is exactly why Adityanath no longer deserves to be called a Yogi. That
title carries a moral weight one rooted in compassion, restraint, and service.
It implies wisdom, not vengeance. Peace, not propaganda. He has betrayed every
part of it.
Adityanath has made a mockery of
justice. Under his rule, extrajudicial killings have been normalized, even
celebrated. Since 2017, nearly 15,000 police operations have been carried out
across Uttar Pradesh, resulting in over 30,000 arrests, 9,467 civilians shot
and injured, and 238 killed in so-called police encounters. The official
justification is always the same: the accused were criminals, they tried to
escape, they fired first. But there is no accountability, no trials, no
cross-examination of these claims. According to the NHRC, over 236 people have
been killed in encounters with zero prosecutions. The state decides who
deserves justice and who deserves death, and the public is told to clap. One of
the most recent examples involved a man named Mohd Shahzad, alias “Nikki,”
accused of rape. Before any trial could begin, he was hunted down and shot in a
forest by police. Maybe he was guilty. But guilt is not proven by a bullet. In
a democracy, justice isn’t carried out at gunpoint by state agents. It is
earned, proven, and upheld in courts. What Adityanath has done is replace the
rule of law with the rule of vengeance.
But not everyone is treated the
same in his Uttar Pradesh. When the accused are poor, Muslim, or Dalit, the
system is swift, brutal, and unforgiving. But when upper-caste men rape and
burn a Dalit girl alive, like in the 2020 Hathras case, the police burn her
body in the dark of night and lock her family in their home. When a Dalit man
is lynched in 2025, his killers get protection, and his family gets isolation.
Justice in this state is caste-coded and politically calculated. The law does
not serve the people it serves the powerful.
And Adityanath has built his
political brand on this double standard. He was not born a Yogi. He was made
one by the RSS, molded into a saffron-clad enforcer marketed as a holy man with
a bulldozer. He promised to rid the state of crime, but what he delivered was
selective state violence. His policies bulldoze homes of the poor without due
process. His police operate as an execution squad. And his government treats
grief as a threat when it doesn’t suit their propaganda.
All of this didn’t happen in a
vacuum. This is the byproduct of Modi’s India an India where nationalism is
used to silence truth, where dissent is equated with treason, and where justice
is negotiable if you're rich or well-connected. Modi, Shah, and Adityanath have
turned fear into a governance model. While the poor are crushed, public money
disappears into the coffers of the connected. Institutions are compromised.
Investigative agencies are used as weapons. The media is muzzled. Meanwhile,
the regime sells itself as the savior of the nation, as long as people stay
distracted by religion, Pakistan, or imagined threats. This is not reform. This
is rot dressed in saffron.
And now that fear is catching up
with them. The lies don’t land the same way. The smears don’t stick. Because
the people are watching who stands beside them when they're broken and who
sends bulldozers instead. The BJP built a machine powered by division and
distraction. But they never planned for what would happen when someone like
Rahul Gandhi simply stood in silence with the victims they tried to erase. They
fear him because he reminds the nation of everything they abandoned: empathy,
justice, and courage.
He is Adityanath, the enforcer of
a corrupt regime. The title of Yogi no longer belongs to him. It never did.
Showing Adityanath with blood dripping from his hands feels a bit too extreme. I understand the anger behind it, and I do agree that many of his methods have been questionable, even unacceptable at times. He's undeniably brought crime down in Uttar Pradesh, but the way justice is applied under his leadership often feels selective and deeply unjust, especially when it comes to Dalits and marginalized groups. I agree that he no longer deserves the title of “Yogi”; that term should carry moral weight, not just religious symbolism. So while I support the overall message of the article, I think the imagery might alienate some people who otherwise agree that his record should be scrutinized.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment. I get that the image can feel harsh, especially to those who admire Adityanath. But that was the point. It had to break through the noise and force a response. This isn’t about attacking faith; it’s about confronting how power is being misused in its name. Sanatan never preached violence, but history shows how religion has been twisted before. We have to speak up before this goes too far. That’s why the image was necessary; it doesn’t let people look away.
Delete